Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 test/framework: ensure ApplyClusterTemplateAndWait always returns a cluster #8142

Merged

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Feb 20, 2023

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR ensures ApplyClusterTemplateAndWait always returns a cluster. This is very useful if a test fails early and we need a cluster to dump and cleanup resources via dumpSpecResourcesAndCleanup.

Let's assume input.ClusterProxy.Apply(ctx, workloadClusterTemplate, input.Args...) fails because e.g. the Cluster cannot be deployed because of some issues with the ClusterClass. Then the cluster would be nil and dumpSpecResourcesAndCleanup would panic. This change ensures we always return a cluster so we can get resources from the test run, even if the cluster creation didn't actually work.

The same applies when e.g. DiscoveryAndWaitForCluster fails.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 20, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 6d662116231b7ecbeb3467d63eeb779b503fb975

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sbueringer: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-main 8838eca link false /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/restart

known flake will be fixed elsewhere

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5a9d42b into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.4 milestone Feb 20, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-improve-e2e-res-dump branch February 20, 2023 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants