📖 docs: document new Kubernetes support policy #8134
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/L
|
cc @kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-maintainers |
|
cc @killianmuldoon (you should be added to the maintainers team soon :)) |
|
I'll bring this PR up in the office hour on Wednesday to figure out the lazy consenus timeline. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 69630a0203da789fae80aa57a456a7b84ad3be70
|
docs/book/src/reference/versions.md
Outdated
| | Kubernetes v1.24 | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Kubernetes v1.25 | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Kubernetes v1.26 | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | | v0.3 (v1alpha3) | v0.4 (v1alpha4) | v1.0 (v1beta1) | v1.1 (v1beta1) | v1.2 (v1beta1) | v1.3 (v1beta1) | v1.4 (v1beta1) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Q: should we add an out of support notice below minors?
Also, at some point, we should also consider dropping columns from those tables
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What do you think about dropping v0.3, v0.4, v1.0 columns (we even dropped the jobs now)?
(also fine for me to keep them if we want to)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added (EOL) as (out of support) requires another two lines in the table header
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1 to drop the columns, if someone want to look at older version support, they can look at holder versions of the book
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sounds good, follow-up: #8168
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
sbueringer
force-pushed
the
pr-k-support-policy
branch
from
bfde5b8 to
4507ff5
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
lgtm
|
As per discussion in the office hour, setting lazy consensus to 1st March |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 788e979da0e5bdcf33329a35c8745ab360a2106d
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
@sbueringer what about backporting this set of changes to the current version of the book as well? |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.3 Why not. Looks like the v1.3 book already contains the table with v1.4 (which I didn't expect, but it's also not really a problem) |
|
@sbueringer: new pull request created: #8174 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Part of #8040