Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🌱 CAPD: only ignore necessary kubeadm preflight errors #7911

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2023
Merged

🌱 CAPD: only ignore necessary kubeadm preflight errors #7911

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2023

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jan 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:

With this PR CAPD only ignores SystemVerification and Swap preflight errors. The goal is to detect other preflight errors which affect other infra providers (e.g. ImagePull). This should bring the test results of CAPD a bit closer to the ones of other infra providers.

Previously we couldn't merge this PR as we had some issues that the ImagePull preflight check for kubeadm join failed in upgrade tests. The root cause was that kubeadm was trying to pull images from the wrong registry. This should now not happen anymore as all our e2e tests (including the upgrade tests) are using Kubernetes versions which have the registry.k8s.io default registry.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 12, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Just opened the PR already so I don't forget it.

Before we merge this PR we have to adress an issue first (~ KCP sometimes patches status into an incosistent state)
We're working on that already.

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 12, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title 🌱 CAPD: only ignore necessary kubeadm preflight errors [WIP] 🌱 CAPD: only ignore necessary kubeadm preflight errors Feb 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 6, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] 🌱 CAPD: only ignore necessary kubeadm preflight errors 🌱 CAPD: only ignore necessary kubeadm preflight errors Apr 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 24, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sbueringer: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-ipv6-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-scale-main-experimental
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-27-latest-main

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-ipv6-main
  • pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-main
  • pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
  • pull-cluster-api-verify-main

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-27-latest-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @killianmuldoon

/hold
for green e2e tests

@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 1d835fd7be6befa984a08f6c732ce6ab297e1a76

vincepri
vincepri approved these changes Apr 24, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 24, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 25, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a2c1f5d into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 25, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.5 milestone Apr 25, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-capd-preflight branch April 25, 2023 09:03
@johannesfrey
Copy link
Contributor

/area provider/infrastructure-docker

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/infrastructure-docker Issues or PRs related to the docker infrastructure provider label Jun 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vincepri vincepri vincepri approved these changes

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed Awaiting requested review from JoelSpeed

@stmcginnis stmcginnis Awaiting requested review from stmcginnis

Assignees

@stmcginnis stmcginnis

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/infrastructure-docker Issues or PRs related to the docker infrastructure provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.5
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@sbueringer @k8s-ci-robot @stmcginnis @johannesfrey @vincepri @killianmuldoon