Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Improve MHC validation for topology-managed MHC #7498

Merged

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon commented Nov 4, 2022

Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon [email protected]

Add validation for nodeStartupTimeout on cluster creation. Merge MHC validation into a single function in the MHC api definition which can then be used for common validation no matter if the MHC is defined in the Cluster topology, the ClusterClass or an individuation MHC object.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 4, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 4, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title [WIP] Improve MHC validation for topology-managed MHC 🐛 [WIP] Improve MHC validation for topology-managed MHC Nov 4, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 4, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title 🐛 [WIP] Improve MHC validation for topology-managed MHC 🐛 Improve MHC validation for topology-managed MHC Nov 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me in general

just a few nits

api/v1beta1/machinehealthcheck_webhook.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/machinehealthcheck_webhook.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/machinehealthcheck_webhook.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/machinehealthcheck_webhook.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/webhooks/cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/webhooks/cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/webhooks/clusterclass.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/webhooks/clusterclass.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/webhooks/clusterclass.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/machinehealthcheck_webhook.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon force-pushed the mhc/improve-validation branch 2 times, most recently from 55f6dce to 928b779 Compare November 8, 2022 11:36
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 8, 2022
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/assign @fabriziopandini

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 9, 2022
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 9, 2022
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 542ac03 into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.3 milestone Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants