Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Improve logging for the MachineSet scale up/down workflow #7026

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
Make logs for the MachineSet scale up/down workflow consistent with the new logging guidelines

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Rif #6994

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 5, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 5, 2022
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the improve-machineset-scale-up-down-logs branch 2 times, most recently from 51c0d95 to aba29f8 Compare August 5, 2022 19:25
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice improvements!

A few comments

internal/controllers/machineset/machineset_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/machineset/machineset_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/machineset/machineset_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/machineset/machineset_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/machineset/machineset_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2022
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the improve-machineset-scale-up-down-logs branch from aba29f8 to b6fddfd Compare September 2, 2022 12:05
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 2, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

@sbueringer all the comments should be addressed now, PTAL at your convenience

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the improve-machineset-scale-up-down-logs branch from b6fddfd to d108d42 Compare September 2, 2022 12:47
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

@sbueringer comments addressed; changes are in a separated commit for a faster review

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/approve

lgtm pending squash :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 2, 2022
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/approve cancel

Hm maybe let's not approve already, not that it gets accidentally merged before squash :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 2, 2022
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the improve-machineset-scale-up-down-logs branch from 11cd71d to 6eda8ea Compare September 4, 2022 13:26
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

@sbueringer squashed

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 825da0b into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.3 milestone Sep 6, 2022
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the improve-machineset-scale-up-down-logs branch October 10, 2022 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants