Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 improve logging for the machine provisioning workflow #6993

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR improve machine provisioning logging based on project's logging guidelines introduced by #6969

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 29, 2022
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the improve-machine-provisioning-logs branch 2 times, most recently from dbb6218 to 263ba79 Compare August 2, 2022 12:14
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently I'm getting requeueing in multiple log messages which is confusing.

Waiting for bootstrap provider to generate data secret and report status.ready, requeing 
Waiting for infrastructure provider to create machine infrastructure and report status.ready, requeing
Waiting for infrastructure provider to report spec.providerID

This is because even though we return requeueAfter we end each of the phase functions (and logging their results).

Could we instead log the result, or some "ending reconcile" message after (maybe) LowestNonZeroResult?

internal/controllers/machine/machine_controller_phases.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/machine/machine_controller_phases.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the improve-machine-provisioning-logs branch from 263ba79 to db1169e Compare August 4, 2022 14:48
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

I have dropped requeueing entirely, it doesn't add much value on top of Waiting

Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 4, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 5, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 43e7a08 into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 5, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.3 milestone Aug 5, 2022
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the improve-machine-provisioning-logs branch September 1, 2022 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants