Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Update example version of core CAPI used in clusterctl #6937

Merged

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon [email protected]

Update the version of CAPI used in examples across the clusterctl codebase.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 15, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title Update example version of core CAPI used in clusterctl 🌱 Update example version of core CAPI used in clusterctl Jul 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 15, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ykakarap ykakarap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2022
@@ -30,18 +30,18 @@ type DeleteOptions struct {
// default rules for kubeconfig discovery will be used.
Kubeconfig Kubeconfig

// CoreProvider version (e.g. cluster-api:v0.3.0) to add to the management cluster. If unspecified, the
// CoreProvider version (e.g. cluster-api:v1.1.5) to add to the management cluster. If unspecified, the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.2?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I went for this as 1.1.5 is released, recent and stable - I don't think we need the most recent versions possible in these examples (but more recent than 0.3.0 would be nice 🙂

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

What is the benefit of trying to keep those versions up-to-date?

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

killianmuldoon commented Jul 18, 2022

What is the benefit of trying to keep those versions up-to-date?

I don't think we should be overly zealous about these versions, but something more recent than completely unsupported is probably reasonable. I think these examples are a signal for users and could possibly be used for copy-paste etc. by new users.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 19, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2fc8bcd into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 19, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.3 milestone Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants