-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Update example version of core CAPI used in clusterctl #6937
🌱 Update example version of core CAPI used in clusterctl #6937
Conversation
Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@@ -30,18 +30,18 @@ type DeleteOptions struct { | |||
// default rules for kubeconfig discovery will be used. | |||
Kubeconfig Kubeconfig | |||
|
|||
// CoreProvider version (e.g. cluster-api:v0.3.0) to add to the management cluster. If unspecified, the | |||
// CoreProvider version (e.g. cluster-api:v1.1.5) to add to the management cluster. If unspecified, the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1.2?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went for this as 1.1.5 is released, recent and stable - I don't think we need the most recent versions possible in these examples (but more recent than 0.3.0 would be nice 🙂
What is the benefit of trying to keep those versions up-to-date? |
I don't think we should be overly zealous about these versions, but something more recent than completely unsupported is probably reasonable. I think these examples are a signal for users and could possibly be used for copy-paste etc. by new users. |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon [email protected]
Update the version of CAPI used in examples across the clusterctl codebase.