-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Run GitHub workflows on all pull requests #5723
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:main
from
CecileRobertMichon:enable-gh-actions-on-release-branches
Nov 29, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,12 +1,8 @@ | ||
name: Check Markdown links | ||
|
||
on: | ||
push: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this was running as post submit, I don't think anyone is paying attention to it though. Running in PRs is enough IMO. |
||
branches: | ||
- main | ||
paths: | ||
- '**.md' | ||
pull_request: | ||
types: [opened, edited, synchronize, reopened] | ||
paths: | ||
- '**.md' | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Q: from which branch the linter config will be taken? from main or from the target branch?
Q: If I got this right, we are going to run a newer version of lint on old branches (previously checked with older versions). Could this introduce some problem?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First Q. I think ~ target branch:
If I understood it correctly: Second Q.: it would use the version which is specified in the workflow file of the base/main/release branch. Or probably more precise the version which is configured in the last commit of the PR, but as long as the commit doesn't change the version it should be the same as on the base/main/release branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What @sbueringer said is correct. We would still be running the same version of lint that's checked in in the old branches. In order to validate that we can look at the golangci-lint job that will run on the backports of this PR on the release branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the clarification!