Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 KCP: stop reconciling ObjectMeta into the KCP machine template #5187

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Sep 1, 2021

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:
The intention of the KCP code is to propagate the ObjectMeta from kcp.Spec.MachineTemplate.ObjectMeta to the control plane machines.

During the machine generation we add a few additional labels/annotations. Unfortunately, we used same map from KCP to add the labels/annotations. So while we wanted to calculate labels/annotations for a new machine we also modified the in-memory ObjectMeta of kcp.Spec.MachineTemplate.ObjectMeta. Later on KCP was automatically patched a few layers above in the call stack.

This PR makes sure we copy the labels/annotations into a new map.

Note:

  • this bug only occurred when kcp.Spec.MachineTemplate.ObjectMeta.{labels,annotations} was set. It then lead to an additional rollout, i.e. when creating a new KCP a new machine was created and automatically replaced by another new machine.
  • tested locally with quickstart (+ using labels/annotations) > no additional reconcile, no kcp.Spec.MachineTemplate.ObjectMeta "reconciliation"

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 1, 2021
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] 🐛 KCP: stop reconciling ObjectMeta into the KCP machine template 🐛 KCP: stop reconciling ObjectMeta into the KCP machine template Sep 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 1, 2021
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7a75113 into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.4 milestone Sep 1, 2021
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-fix-kcp-meta-reconciliation branch September 1, 2021 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants