Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Add optional parameter for using repolist to the kubetest library #4069

Merged

Conversation

jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor

@jsturtevant jsturtevant commented Jan 13, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds an optional parameter for using KUBE_TEST_REPO_LIST. More info on this KUBE_TEST_REPO_LIST is here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/images/README.md#testing-the-new-image

This currently required to be able to run the upstream tests for windows: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/windows/README.md#notes-to-run-sig-windows-tests.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 13, 2021
@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have this working with kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure#1119

@jsturtevant jsturtevant changed the title Add optional parameter for using repolist to the kubetest library 🌱 Add optional parameter for using repolist to the kubetest library Jan 13, 2021
@jsturtevant jsturtevant changed the title 🌱 Add optional parameter for using repolist to the kubetest library 🌱 Add optional parameter for using repolist to the kubetest library Jan 13, 2021
@jsturtevant jsturtevant force-pushed the add-kubetestrepolist branch 2 times, most recently from 7ff8792 to f5696e9 Compare January 13, 2021 23:00
@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-test-main

@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor Author

The tests failing was related to #4076, I've rebased to include that change

@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess the timeout didn't help, When I run this the failing test locally I get a pass:

Ran 5 of 5 Specs in 9.457 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 5 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
--- PASS: TestAPIs (9.46s)
PASS
ok  	sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/exp/addons/controllers	9.504s
``

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/milestone v0.4.0
/retest
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 19, 2021
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 19, 2021
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 19, 2021
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants