-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ add condition merge utils #3103
✨ add condition merge utils #3103
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. just minor nits
conditions := from.GetConditions() | ||
|
||
conditionsInScope := make([]localizedCondition, 0, len(conditions)) | ||
for i := range conditions { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can be for i, c := range conditions {
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unfortunately not, because we are using &c
down in the loop and the linter complains for:
Using a reference for the variable on range scope
c``
/lgtm |
I had comments on this PR but didn't make it in time, also we forgot to squash |
@vincepri I'm happy to pick up your comments and address in a new PR. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR implements a utils for handling conditions according to the design patterns introduced by the condition CAEP (Mirror, Aggregate, Summarize)
/cc @gab-satchi