Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📖 Add intial Spot instances proposal #2817

Merged

Conversation

JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Based off of the google doc proposal that was shared at the end of February, I have created this proposal doc based off of the template explaining how Spot instances should be implemented across the three cloud providers; AWS, Azure, GCP.

Note, this proposal does not change anything within the cluster-api repository itself, but is hosted here so that the implementation of spot support across the cloud providers can be tracked centrally and implemented in a similar manner across each provider. The goal of this project is that support should feel the same in each of the providers.

I think I've included all the people who I discussed this with and gave feedback in the reviewers list, let me know if anyone else should be added

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 30, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from detiber and ncdc March 30, 2020 11:47
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 14, 2020
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

+1 from my side to get this work started.

@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Apr 15, 2020

/hold
holding for additional reviewers
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Apr 15, 2020
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Apr 15, 2020

thanks @JoelSpeed
/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel
/milestone v0.3.4

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.3.4 milestone Apr 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d5784c9 into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants