[clusterctl] Provide control over local override features

[fabriziopandini]

User Story

As a developer, I would like to run clusterctl tests in isolation (without local overrides interfering on the test)

Detailed Description

Clusterctk supports local overrides and this feature proved super useful fo far.
However, local overrides can interfere with e2e test running on a developer machine.

Anything else you would like to add:

I see two options:

• use a well known OS variable to force clusterctl to ignore local overrides
• make the override folder configurable (or assume the override folder should be on the same location of the config file, which is already configurable)

The change should be implemented here, but it is required to make all the information required for activating/deactivating local oveerides

/area clusterctl
/kind feature
/help

[k8s-ci-robot]

@fabriziopandini:
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.

Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.

If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help command.

In response to this:

User Story

As a developer, I would like to run clusterctl tests in isolation (without local overrides interfering on the test)

Detailed Description

Clusterctk supports local overrides and this feature proved super useful fo far.
However, local overrides can interfere with e2e test running on a developer machine.

Anything else you would like to add:

I see two options:

• use a well known OS variable to force clusterctl to ignore local overrides
• make the override folder configurable (or assume the override folder should be on the same location of the config file, which is already configurable)

The change should be implemented here, but it is required to make all the information required for activating/deactivating local oveerides

/area clusterctl
/kind feature
/help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[vincepri]

/milestone v0.3.0

+1 on making the user folder configurable

[wfernandes]

/assign

[vincepri]

/milestone v0.3.x

[ncdc]

@wfernandes are you still planning on working on this?

[wfernandes]

@ncdc Yes. I was planning on working on this but I haven't yet started work on it. I've been getting sidetracked with other issues.

[wfernandes]

/lifecycle active

[wfernandes]

Thoughts on what needs to be done

• Make override folder configurable. See if using the config file path would be a viable solution.
• Make changes to clusterctl e2e tests to use configurable overrides directory.
• Update docs

[wfernandes]

So I'm going to start implementation but before I do, I'd like to get some consensus.

Instead of passing in another flag for overrides or OS env variable, I think it would make sense to use the same directory that clusterctl.yaml is in.
That is, if we do clusterctl --config=/my/dir/path/clusterctl.yaml, we would look for the overrides in /my/dir/path/overrides.
I'm using the overrides directory still so as to not break the current UX.

/cc @fabriziopandini

[fabriziopandini]

@wfernandes this was one on my suggested options, so I'm ok

make the override folder configurable (or assume the override folder should be on the same location of the config file, which is already configurable)

not sure if linking the override folder to the config file is ok for @vincepri who expressed +1 for “make the override folder configurable“

[wfernandes]

So after digging more into the codebase and implementing a solution, a thought came to me.

Do we need the overrides directory if we ask the user to update the ~/.cluster-api/clusterctl.yaml with the appropriate filepath url?

That is, if the users have their local releases in a directory like ~/workspace/releases/infra-aws/v0.5.0/infra-comp.yaml, they can just specify that path in the clusterctl.yaml for the aws provider.

Currently, we are dissecting the above path mentioned as

basepath:~/workspace/releases
providerID: infra-aws
version: v0.5.0
componentsPath: infra-comp.yaml

The above happens when we try and get the cluster-template.yaml and the metadata.yaml as well.

From a developer user experience, the local-overrides.py script can continue to put the information in ~/.cluster-api/overrides and then we can ask the user to update the provider url in the clusterctl.yaml (or do that for the developer in the script). We could (maybe should) rename the files created by the local-overrides.py as infrastructure-components-dev.yaml.

It seems that the getLocalOverrides only happens when getting the components.yaml. I'm happy to further discuss in slack and/or zoom. I'll be picking this issue back up next week. 🙂

/cc @fabriziopandini @vincepri

[fabriziopandini]

@wfernandes let's zoom/chat when you pickup the issue again next week

I'm not sure I fully understand your idea above, but changing the provider URL in the config file can't fix the issue that arises when running E2E tests and existing overrides leak-in.

getLocalOverrides only happens when getting the components.yaml

Get local overrides is called when reading from a repository the component yaml, metadata and also cluster-templates

[wfernandes]

After discussing with @fabriziopandini we decided on adding a property in the clusterctl config file that determines the overrides folder path.
So in clusterctl.yaml you can specify

overridesFolder: /some/dir/path

We will still default to ~/.cluster-api/overrides