Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Include more device_owners when looking for a port for floating ip #1996

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

bilbobrovall
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it: Adds support in GetPortForExternalNetwork for more distributed/ha-routers

Which issue(s) this PR fixes: Fixes #1985

I'm not 100% sure if we need all these device_owners or if we need some additional, I got them from https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/master/neutron_lib/constants.py#L74 but didn't find any good documentation on them.

Special notes for your reviewer:

  1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • if necessary:
    • includes documentation
    • adds unit tests

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @bilbobrovall. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit df19807
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/660d8203f343f00007704ad3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1996--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor

huxcrux commented Apr 3, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 3, 2024
Comment on lines +62 to +65
type PortListOpts struct {
DeviceOwner []string `q:"device_owner"`
NetworkID string `q:"network_id"`
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pierreprinetti: I know you've been looking at this from Gophercloud perspective. Is this the way to go here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eventually hopefully not, but I think this is the only way to go currently.

@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Apr 5, 2024

Makes sense to me, tiny request for clarification in the comments.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mdbooth mdbooth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Comment on lines +62 to +65
type PortListOpts struct {
DeviceOwner []string `q:"device_owner"`
NetworkID string `q:"network_id"`
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eventually hopefully not, but I think this is the only way to go currently.

NetworkID: instancePort.NetworkID,
DeviceOwner: "network:router_interface",
DeviceOwner: []string{"network:router_interface", "network:router_interface_distributed", "network:ha_router_replicated_interface", "network:router_ha_interface"},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the stuff I'd really like to push into the domain of gophercloud.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mdbooth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 9, 2024
@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Apr 9, 2024

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 626738a into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 9, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect FloatingIP workflow
5 participants