-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Add Cilium as CNI Option #1346
Conversation
Signed-off-by: modzilla99 <[email protected]>
Welcome @modzilla99! |
Hi @modzilla99. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: modzilla99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
/ok-to-test |
thanks for the PR I am currently actually working on #1323 so this might be follow up of that ? |
Yes that would indeed be a great follow up! Will wait for your pr to be merged. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten @jichenjc hey there, sorry to bother or are there any news on different cnis? |
My preference would be for users to be able to configure security groups in a generic way, rather than providing specific configuration for every CNI that could be supported. The AWS provider defines a |
yes, I Think it's similar to #1274 , provide a config map or define a CRD ,then predefine some well known CNI like calico or clium |
Yes. Same as the last time this came up I remain opposed to merging this. We shouldn't be embedding this configuration in code. If we need to add support for another CNI, now is the time to add configuration support for that. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
You'll be covered by #1826 |
/close |
@EmilienM: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: modzilla99 [email protected]
What this PR does / why we need it:
With that PR you'll be able to deploy Cilium with SecurityGroups enabled.
TODOs:
/hold