Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨E2E error logging improvements #1032

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2021

Conversation

mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

@mdbooth mdbooth commented Oct 27, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

This makes 2 improvements to error logging in E2E tests:

  • Specific improvements in gomega error reporting in the multi-network test
  • Stop using --stream for ginkgo output

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 27, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 27, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: c12f58b

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/6179b2f70d7a3d0007c4d477

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1032--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 27, 2021
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Nov 1, 2021

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test

@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor Author

mdbooth commented Nov 1, 2021

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test

Looks like this was required due to a flake in devstack 🤔 Lets keep an eye on how common this is. If this happens too often, this would be a more compelling reason to bring back preinstalled than the time saved.

@tobiasgiese
Copy link
Member

tobiasgiese commented Nov 1, 2021

Because of

Stop using --stream for ginkgo output

Should we also stop using -stream for the ginkgo conformance tests?

CONFORMANCE_GINKGO_ARGS ?= -stream

Because the target test-e2e will also trigger the target test-e2e-image-prerequisites

Edit: I just checked the output. I don't think that will give us any advantages 🙂 okay with it as is

@tobiasgiese
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 1, 2021
@hidekazuna
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hidekazuna, mdbooth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8fcb3e8 into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 2, 2021
@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti deleted the e2e-error-logging branch February 25, 2022 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants