Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨manager: add liveness/readiness probes #291

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

✨manager: add liveness/readiness probes #291

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cpanato
Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato commented Mar 2, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add liveness/readiness probes similar did here: kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api#2156 and in other capX

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Specify your PR reviewers:

/cc @gyliu513 @jichenjc @xunpan

Special notes for your reviewer:

/area provider/ibmcloud

  1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

Release note:

manager: add liveness/readiness probes

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider label Mar 2, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @cpanato. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2020
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Mar 2, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 2, 2020
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Mar 2, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 2, 2020
@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Mar 2, 2020

Humm looks like need to bump controller-runtime will do in another PR

@gyliu513 gyliu513 removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 2, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato
To complete the pull request process, please assign jichenjc
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jichenjc in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Mar 2, 2020

@gyliu513 looks like my previous PR for bumping the modules #292 bump in the require section 🤦‍♂ and forgot the replace. :(

but for this PR works we need to bump the cluster-api and that have some update changes to v1aplha2

i can try to take a look on that if you find that is useful. thoughts?

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Mar 2, 2020

yes, cluster-api v1alpha2 is a good thing , let us know you need any help
for this as I did some thing for openstack before

@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Mar 2, 2020

@jichenjc looks like it is a lot of things to do :/ not sure if i will have enough time to do that soon and the knowledge as well

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Mar 2, 2020

yes.. I understand it takes time .. just let me know you want to do it then I can provide links we did before for openstack

@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Mar 2, 2020

@jichenjc thanks, yep links to the previous work will be great!

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Mar 2, 2020

@cpanato please refer to the discussion and all the items listed kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack#380, as this ibmcloud implementation refer to openstack when it's first built
the things listed in that issue should be helpful :)

@gyliu513
Copy link
Contributor

gyliu513 commented Mar 3, 2020

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cpanato: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud-test 302f85d link /test pull-cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud-test
pull-cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud-check 302f85d link /test pull-cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud-check
pull-cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud-make 302f85d link /test pull-cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud-make

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 1, 2020
@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Jun 2, 2020

will close this for now, need upgrade the API here first

@cpanato cpanato closed this Jun 2, 2020
@cpanato cpanato deleted the add-health branch June 2, 2020 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants