-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
do we have plan to support different k8s vendor #87
Comments
This project has no plan for doing this. It is traced in |
kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api#997 is on the way |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/kind feature
Describe the solution you'd like
[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]
do we have plan to support the different k8s vendor like ICP or some others and the user cases was:
cc @gyliu513 @xunpan
Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: