Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do we have plan to support different k8s vendor #87

Closed
hchenxa opened this issue Apr 30, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

do we have plan to support different k8s vendor #87

hchenxa opened this issue Apr 30, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
future Future Works kind/question Question for IBM Cloud Provider kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@hchenxa
Copy link
Contributor

hchenxa commented Apr 30, 2019

/kind feature

Describe the solution you'd like
[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]

do we have plan to support the different k8s vendor like ICP or some others and the user cases was:

  1. If I already have a ICP cluster, I want to use cluster api to deploy the ICP and use the MCM to manage the provided ICP cluster.
  2. If I already have a ICP cluster, I can use cluster api to deploy other vendor k8s but I want to use ICP MCM to manage those cluster.
  3. If I did not have a ICP cluster, but I want to use ICP to have some IBM application running, so I may use cluster api to deploy an ICP cluster and deploy the IBM application(from ICP catalog) running on ICP k8s.

cc @gyliu513 @xunpan
Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

@xunpan
Copy link
Contributor

xunpan commented Apr 30, 2019

This project has no plan for doing this.

It is traced in cluster-api kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api#853

@gyliu513 gyliu513 added future Future Works kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. labels Apr 30, 2019
@gyliu513 gyliu513 added the kind/question Question for IBM Cloud Provider label May 29, 2019
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api#997 is on the way
I think we need defer this to align with v1alpha2

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 17, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 17, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
future Future Works kind/question Question for IBM Cloud Provider kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants