Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace reference of POWERVS_PROVIDER_ID_FORMAT with PROVIDER_ID_FORMAT #1471

Closed
Karthik-K-N opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1473
Closed

Replace reference of POWERVS_PROVIDER_ID_FORMAT with PROVIDER_ID_FORMAT #1471

Karthik-K-N opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1473
Assignees
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Milestone

Comments

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

/kind feature
/area provider/ibmcloud

Describe the solution you'd like
[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]

Power VS provider id format has been deprecated and removed via PR, PR.

We are supposed to use PROVIDER_ID_FORMAT environmental variable or --provider-id-fmt flag.

Need to update code and document to refer the same.

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider labels Nov 2, 2023
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor Author

/good-first-issue

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N:
This request has been marked as suitable for new contributors.

Guidelines

Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions:

  • Why are we solving this issue?
  • To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points?
  • Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry?
  • How can the assignee reach out to you for help?

For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see here and ensure that they are met.

If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-good-first-issue command.

In response to this:

/good-first-issue

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. labels Nov 2, 2023
@kishen-v
Copy link
Contributor

kishen-v commented Nov 2, 2023

/assign
Will make the required changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants