-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add proposal for automating AKS features #4304
Conversation
The Summary/Motivation sections should be reasonably complete. Looking for feedback on those sections before digging into the actual proposal. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4304 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 62.46% 62.46%
=======================================
Files 192 192
Lines 15394 15394
=======================================
Hits 9616 9616
Misses 5118 5118
Partials 660 660 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I think this is reasonably complete and ready for review, though maybe a bit thin in parts. /retitle add proposal for automating AKS features |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work putting this together @nojnhuh ! 👏🏼
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm strongly leaning for option 4
/cc @matthchr Interested to see what you might think here. |
@nojnhuh: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: matthchr. Note that only kubernetes-sigs members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
At today's community meeting we agreed to start lazy consensus on this ending in one week. Please leave any last feedback soon! |
/lgtm Not every proposal lands with a consensus aye vote for a seventh option, nice work! /approve @nojnhuh let's release the hold after this week's community meeting |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: d0d199fe7f59447db0aa53d635a0c7b7d1190f08
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
7️⃣
71cd7bd
to
8d6fc14
Compare
/lgtm |
Broken link should be fixed now. PTAL. /hold for squash |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 13a5e8010508b3bcc3b33c66230d8919b77e8d0d
|
71ebbe4
to
8daff40
Compare
squashed! |
What type of PR is this?
/kind proposal
What this PR does / why we need it: This PR adds a proposal for implementing #3629.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Release note:
/hold for squash