Install cloud provider azure Helm chart with CAAPH

[Jont828]

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it: Install cloud provider azure Helm chart with CAAPH in e2e tests.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #3736

Special notes for your reviewer:

• cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

Install cloud provider azure Helm chart with CAAPH

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign justinsb for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7c1a8a2) 60.46% compared to head (c32e0c9) 60.45%.
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4246      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.46%   60.45%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         191      191              
  Lines       19201    19195       -6     
==========================================
- Hits        11610    11604       -6     
  Misses       6947     6947              
  Partials      644      644              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@Jont828: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade	4206fbe	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts	c32e0c9	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts	c32e0c9	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-ipv6-with-ci-artifacts	c32e0c9	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-ipv6-with-ci-artifacts
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts	c32e0c9	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds	c32e0c9	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds	c32e0c9	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[k8s-ci-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[jackfrancis]

@Jont828 I think we want to install with a label assignment during E2E runtime rather than adding the label in the template itself. Like we ended up doing here for azuredisk-csi:

• https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure/pull/4334/files#diff-1131bb4107662928d2a952d842948b3d7ae633a00339807f164ac7446ad807c5

Basically some of these templates may be used by downstream cloud-provider-azure tests where they want to install their own opinionated installation of cloud-provider-azure (for example from bits built at runtime against a cloud-provider-azure dev branch).

cc @CecileRobertMichon

[Jont828]

/assign @CecileRobertMichon

[Jont828]

@jackfrancis I already set up something similar since it's configured based on an environment variable

[CecileRobertMichon]

/close

will open a new PR when ready

[k8s-ci-robot]

@CecileRobertMichon: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

will open a new PR when ready

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.