test: Add missing unit test for covering azure.ParseResourceID()

[chandankumar4]

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add the missing unit test case for covering azure.ParseResourceID()

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #3622

Special notes for your reviewer:

• cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @chandankumar4. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[chandankumar4]

This method is not used anywhere

[mboersma]

/ok-to-test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6e074c7) 57.87% compared to head (0b2b6b7) 58.17%.
Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4165      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   57.87%   58.17%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       19212    19191      -21     
==========================================
+ Hits        11118    11164      +46     
+ Misses       7466     7399      -67     
  Partials      628      628              

Files	Coverage Δ
azure/services/virtualmachines/client.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mboersma]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 2a947963978a4371f54c1b5cc72105e1c6d34731

[CecileRobertMichon]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [CecileRobertMichon]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment