-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
include IPAMConfig CRD w/ ClusterResourceSets #3345
include IPAMConfig CRD w/ ClusterResourceSets #3345
Conversation
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e |
/retest |
/retest |
@jackfrancis: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e |
/assign @CecileRobertMichon @marosset This has now passed the VMSS test 4 times in a row (5th attempt in progress). It has also never repro'd locally for me after a similar number of E2E runs. Let's get a few more runs documented in the PR to account for the fact that we don't fully understand why not shipping the CRD definition w/ the CRD resource causes unexpected data values later on, but from our statistical observations over the past week we seem to have crossed the boundary of any other possible explanation for VMSS E2E test success other than "this change is one of the possible changes that fixes #3227". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
thanks @jackfrancis!
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: e1885b85ec8b600e2827541e37b74b8b88d3be13
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e |
I'm going to merge and then cherry-pick this into release-1.7 and release-1.8. Here is an example of this failure in release-1.7: Here is an example of this failure in release-1.8: |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-1.7 |
@jackfrancis: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.7 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.8 |
@jackfrancis: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.8 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
great work investigating and root causing this one! /lgtm |
/retest optional job failed with #3313 |
@jackfrancis: #3345 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.7":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jackfrancis: new pull request created: #3348 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds the crd.projectcalico.org definition for
IPAMConfig
to theClusterResourceSet
definitions we include for test templates that require them (test templates with Windows node pools).We already include via a
ClusterResourceSet
resource akind: IPAMConfig
resource in order to fulfill the required calico configurationstrictAffinity: true
. Not including the reference CRD resource has the effect of forcing the CAPI controller-manager runtime to continually retry the application of theClusterResourceSet
payload ofkind: IPAMConfig
, and may have the side-effect of disrupting thestrictAffinity: true
configuration during helm installation of calico.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #3227
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.
TODOs:
Release note: