-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
move ClusterDescriber methods to CRD types #825
Comments
/assign @alexeldeib |
We also need to start unit testing these files, maybe we can use that as a forcing function , or at least as a stepping stone to make it easier. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
@alexeldeib is this still in progress? Anything we can help with? |
The main reason for this is to enable #826, which I haven't worked on much recently. I'm poking at those parts again but I don't have an explicit timeline for that. I think right now #1418 and #1376 are the top issues for managed clusters. Once we tidy that up a bit, I'll probably circle back here. unassigning for now /remove-lifecycle stale |
/milestone v0.5.x |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
@jackfrancis: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/kind cleanup
Describe the solution you'd like
Move implementation of ClusterDescriber interface onto CRD types directly, e.g. AzureCluster and AzureManagedControlPlane. This allows machine scope to use either one to extract join parameters as long as it implements the required interface, which I PoC'd in #822
Anything else you would like to add:
See https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure/pull/822/files#diff-890b2d661da1708cb3d23d43fc548ceeR67 and associated implementation https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure/pull/822/files#diff-db9119511124ddd279659a96a3c579cfR116
This lets us start to take a duck typing approach to machine scope parameters and allow for alternate provider implementations to reuse AzureMachine more easily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: