-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Restore subnet management functionality #4474
🐛 Restore subnet management functionality #4474
Conversation
/priority critical-urgent |
/assign @richardcase |
Might also be good to incorporate giantswarm@407bd98 |
@vincepri: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: AndiDog. Note that only kubernetes-sigs members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I'd be happy if you cherry-pick that commit. That's exactly the workaround we have in our fork for the moment. It applies almost cleanly to v2.2.1, so I'm sure the patch is still fine. What do maintainers say about reverting to the original behavior for now? (CC @richardcase who was also involved in network discussions apart from the people already assigned on this PR) |
ebb6ac5
to
2dfc9bd
Compare
/test ? |
@vincepri: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e |
2dfc9bd
to
b78118f
Compare
From a project and SIG perspective, we should strive to retain key features and behavior that made this project successful. With Terraform licensing change, I suspect more and more users would prefer Cluster API to manage infrastructure required to have a functional cluster. Subnets are definitely in that mix. The reversal of these commits it's not a breaking change, but rather a regression fix; going from required to optional is fine from an API perspective. Regarding ClusterClass and SSA, as mentioned in the PR description we should find alternative solutions rather than breaking existing functionality. |
b78118f
to
214db67
Compare
cfe1665
to
3b77e28
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/hold
(due to review comments)
As discussed just now on slack, to allow more time for testing and review: /milestone v2.3.0 |
9c9eb0c
to
112640d
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks |
/retest |
@vincepri: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
112640d
to
ca671fb
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e |
Looks good so far. Which cases did you test manually so far? Should we help testing this change before merging? I think we should fix the single-case |
ca671fb
to
66eb159
Compare
@AndiDog Only tested without ClusterClass, creating subnets managed by CAPA in different AZs. I'll fix the switch statement now; given the e2e are passing we should be good to merge and follow-up with the other tests/bits later? |
This reverts commit 1bc6ce8.
This reverts commit 39f088b.
Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]>
66eb159
to
703ec18
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/unhold
@richardcase: #4474 failed to apply on top of branch "release-2.2":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/kind bug
/kind api-change
/kind regression
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR reverts some commits originally introduced in #3748 to support ClusterClass with SSA and proposes a different approach that's backward compatible with that functionality.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #4026
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist:
Release note: