-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: incorrect snapshot size with default 100Gi #2040
Conversation
Hi @umagnus. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
pkg/azurefile/controllerserver.go
Outdated
if err != nil { | ||
return nil, status.Errorf(codes.Internal, "failed to get file share(%s) quota: %v", fileShareName, err) | ||
} | ||
itemSnapshotQuota = *fileshare.ShareQuota |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use ptr.Deref(fileshare.ShareQuota, 0)
to avoid nil pointer panic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think here should be itemSnapshotQuota = pointer.Int32Deref(fileshare.ShareQuota, defaultAzureFileQuota)
since 0 will also return an error
1ff9478
to
03dee0e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
/retest |
@umagnus: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
I've quickly checked the patch in OpenShift and it looks good. Driver log with snapshot creation -
Snapshot created with correct restore size:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, umagnus The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherrypick release-1.30 |
/cherrypick release-1.29 |
/cherrypick release-1.28 |
@andyzhangx: new pull request created: #2041 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@andyzhangx: #2040 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.28":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@andyzhangx: new pull request created: #2042 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
fix: fix snapshot size using default 100Gi
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2039
Requirements:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: