-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: Add darwin unit test workflow #564
CI: Add darwin unit test workflow #564
Conversation
Hi @mayankshah1607. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
2ce1888
to
da3bb5f
Compare
7910ec2
to
03d4ef6
Compare
@andyzhangx It looks like a lot of cases require different error for darwin. Should we introduce a |
03d4ef6
to
8c47960
Compare
aa77a32
to
ca5a78d
Compare
do you have the details about specific |
abad032
to
c738792
Compare
desc string | ||
req csi.NodeGetVolumeStatsRequest | ||
expectedErr error | ||
skipOnDarwin bool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andyzhangx In many test cases, I have provided an option to skip on darwin as the tests return the following error:
util/mount on this platform is not supported
Tests are also skipped on darwin when the returned error is nil
/ok-to-test |
Signed-off-by: Mayank Shah <[email protected]>
c738792
to
c37284a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, mayankshah1607 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…stype fix: incorrect protocol and fsType combination
Signed-off-by: Mayank Shah [email protected]
What type of PR is this?
/kind test
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add MacOS unit test workflow
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Requirements:
Special notes for your reviewer:
@andyzhangx This is a duplicate of #555; working on this clean branch to fix any further test failures as seen in the above mentioned PR
Release note: