This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Create client for checking CRD deletion #1305
Create client for checking CRD deletion #1305
Changes from all commits
c726458
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the client is created 100% by variables/info available outside this function, wouldn't it make more sense to just pass the client into this function instead of using a special bool to create a fake client or not?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a good point, although in this context I'm not sure it's worth the added complexity. The interface and global variable would still have to be declared in this file, while the clients that implement it would now be in cmd/manager/main.go and internal/reconcilers/suite_test.go, so the logic would be fairly scattered. The way @GinnyJI has written it, pretty much everything you need to know is in the same place, and I think that simplicity is worthwhile.
If we start adding a bunch more options here, then I'd be open to refactoring it. wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that sounds good.