Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cannot update snapshot metadata #149

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zhucan
Copy link
Member

@zhucan zhucan commented Jul 23, 2019

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
When external-snapshotter image version upgraded, we should rebuild CRD, delete old CRD and use new CRD

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #147

Special notes for your reviewer:
@xing-yang
@msau42

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

cannot update snapshot metadata

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Jul 23, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhucan
To complete the pull request process, please assign jingxu97
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jingxu97 in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from jingxu97 and lpabon July 23, 2019 06:39
@zhucan
Copy link
Member Author

zhucan commented Jul 23, 2019

/assign @xing-yang

klog.Infof("can not find VolumeSnapshotResource: %s, err: %#v", crd.Name, err)
}
} else {
err = clientset.ApiextensionsV1beta1().CustomResourceDefinitions().Delete(crd.Name, &metav1.DeleteOptions{})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We must not use delete crd method, when we delete the crd, all the CR will also be deleted. we should compare the crd spec and update the crd if the spec changes.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, if the spec not changes, no need to delete the crd

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @wackxu for your comments!
Hi @zhucan Can you try @wackxu's suggestion? Check if the spec has changed first, and then use the Update method, not the Delete, to update the CRD.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should not install crd with the snapshotter and instead make it admin operation.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wackxu @xing-yang Thanks, it's a good suggestion

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@msau42 What you mean is to put 'install crd' step in admin operation, for example, create from yaml instead of install crd from snapshotter?

@Madhu-1
Copy link
Contributor

Madhu-1 commented Oct 16, 2019

@zhucan any update on this one?

@zhucan
Copy link
Member Author

zhucan commented Oct 16, 2019

@Madhu-1 Maybe create CRD from yaml? I'm not sure. Maybe you can ask for xingyang @xing-yang

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

We no longer installs CRDs directly from the controller when snapshot goes beta. So we don't need to fix it here any more.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zhucan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-csi-external-snapshotter-1-17-on-kubernetes-1-17 4dca7ae link /test pull-kubernetes-csi-external-snapshotter-1-17-on-kubernetes-1-17

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 10, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zhucan: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 9, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 8, 2020
@yuxiangqian
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is no longer needed @zhucan

@zhucan
Copy link
Member Author

zhucan commented Apr 29, 2020

I believe this is no longer needed @zhucan

yes,I will close it.

@zhucan zhucan closed this Apr 29, 2020
xing-yang added a commit to xing-yang/external-snapshotter that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2021
c0a4fb1 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#164 from anubha-v-ardhan/patch-1
9c6a6c0 Master to main cleanup
682c686 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#162 from pohly/pod-name-via-shell-command
36a29f5 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#163 from pohly/remove-bazel
68e43ca prow.sh: remove Bazel build support
c5f59c5 prow.sh: allow shell commands in CSI_PROW_SANITY_POD
71c810a Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#161 from pohly/mock-test-fixes
9e438f8 prow.sh: fix mock testing
d7146c7 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#160 from pohly/kind-update
4b6aa60 prow.sh: update to KinD v0.11.0
7cdc76f Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#159 from pohly/fix-deployment-selection
ef8bd33 prow.sh: more flexible CSI_PROW_DEPLOYMENT, part II
204bc89 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#158 from pohly/fix-deployment-selection
61538bb prow.sh: more flexible CSI_PROW_DEPLOYMENT
2b0e6db Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#157 from humblec/csi-release
a2fcd6d Adding myself to csi reviewers group
f325590 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#149 from pohly/cluster-logs
4b03b30 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#155 from pohly/owners
a6453c8 owners: introduce aliases
ad83def Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#153 from pohly/fix-image-builds
5561780 build.make: fix image publishng
29bd39b Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#152 from pohly/bump-csi-test
bc42793 prow.sh: use csi-test v4.2.0
b546baa Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#150 from mauriciopoppe/windows-multiarch-args
bfbb6f3 add parameter base_image and addon_image to BUILD_PARAMETERS
2d61d3b Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#151 from humblec/cm
48e71f0 Replace `which` command ( non standard)  with `command -v` builtin
feb20e2 prow.sh: collect cluster logs
7b96bea Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#148 from dobsonj/add-checkpathcmd-to-prow
2d2e03b prow.sh: enable -csi.checkpathcmd option in csi-sanity
09d4151 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#147 from pohly/mock-testing
74cfbc9 prow.sh: support mock tests
4a3f110 prow.sh: remove obsolete test suppression
6616a6b Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#146 from pohly/kubernetes-1.21
510fb0f prow.sh: support Kubernetes 1.21
c63c61b prow.sh: add CSI_PROW_DEPLOYMENT_SUFFIX
51ac11c Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#144 from pohly/pull-jobs
dd54c92 pull-test.sh: test importing csi-release-tools into other repo
7d2643a Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#143 from pohly/path-setup
6880b0c prow.sh: avoid creating paths unless really running tests

git-subtree-dir: release-tools
git-subtree-split: c0a4fb1
xing-yang pushed a commit to xing-yang/external-snapshotter that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cannot update snapshot metadata
8 participants