Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rev to version 1.13 #23

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 27, 2019
Merged

Conversation

brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

@yliaog
Copy link
Collaborator

yliaog commented Mar 16, 2019

is there any manual change? probably nice to add the command you run to generate the files in the PR, so it can be easily repeated, and verified.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 16, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 20, 2019
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yliaog Split this up into human intervention and boilerplate PRs...

Thanks!

| client 0.1.0a1 | ✓ |
|------------------|-----------------|-----------------|
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when click on 'View file', i see -------------------- row in the matrix, is it intentional?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed.

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
#!/bin/bash

# Copyright 2015 The Kubernetes Authors.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/2015/2019/

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed.

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
#!/bin/bash
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so this is a bash script, it's better to name the file as xxxx.sh?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

settings is consistent with both the instructions in the gen repo and the other client repos...

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ This endpoint does not need any parameter.

### HTTP request headers

- **Content-Type**: application/json, application/yaml, application/vnd.kubernetes.protobuf
- **Content-Type**: Not defined
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this change? looks suspicious

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These docs are generated. I suspect the Swagger is broken, but I don't think it's worth fixing the swagger for this PR.

**Kind** | **string** | Kind is a string value representing the REST resource this object represents. Servers may infer this from the endpoint the client submits requests to. Cannot be updated. In CamelCase. More info: https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/devel/api-conventions.md#types-kinds | [optional] [default to null]
**Metadata** | [***V1ObjectMeta**](v1.ObjectMeta.md) | Standard object metadata. | [optional] [default to null]
**Spec** | [***AppsV1beta1DeploymentSpec**](apps.v1beta1.DeploymentSpec.md) | Specification of the desired behavior of the Deployment. | [optional] [default to null]
**Status** | [***AppsV1beta1DeploymentStatus**](apps.v1beta1.DeploymentStatus.md) | Most recently observed status of the Deployment. | [optional] [default to null]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so the description is removed, any idea what's the reason for that?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as above.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments (mostly) addressed, please re-check.

@yliaog
Copy link
Collaborator

yliaog commented Mar 27, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, yliaog

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [brendandburns,yliaog]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1c33110 into kubernetes-client:master Mar 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants