-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve kubeconfig/gcp handling of credentials in e2e tests #1404
improve kubeconfig/gcp handling of credentials in e2e tests #1404
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
/hold |
This statement is quite misleading. You are not mentioning that your change is only applicable to our "E2E tests". So for a normal user, this will have no effect. |
Yes, and that's a feature. I did not intend to break people's stuff. I only intend to fix our e2e stuff. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
/lgtm cancel |
/unhold |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 47025ed3837e133f31bc7eda7bbbfb3b1b884503
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ahmedwaleedmalik, xmudrii, xrstf The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/override pull-machine-controller-e2e-openstack |
@xrstf: Overrode contexts on behalf of xrstf: pull-machine-controller-e2e-openstack, pull-machine-controller-e2e-openstack-project-auth, pull-machine-controller-e2e-ubuntu-upgrade, pull-machine-controller-e2e-vsphere In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherrypick release/v1.43 |
/cherrypick release/v1.45 |
/cherrypick release/v1.42 |
@xrstf: #1404 failed to apply on top of branch "release/v1.43":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@xrstf: #1404 failed to apply on top of branch "release/v1.45":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@xrstf: #1404 failed to apply on top of branch "release/v1.42":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR ensures that we always inject a base64-encoded kubeconfig in the kubevirt config, even if (in the future) an unencoded kubeconfig was provided in the e2e tests / via env vars. The same careful handling was added to the GCP SA, which also needs to be base64-encoded, which was never mentioned anywhere.
Nothing changes for the users. This only affects our testing.
/kind cleanup
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change? Then add your Release Note here: