-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 710
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove TensorBoard related code in operator #391
Conversation
@gaocegege Do you want to assign a reviewer from Caicloud? |
I think everyone could review it and most of us are on holiday now 😄 |
related to the release cycle of this repo - i think we need to give our audience some expectation of release cycles, and to delete some code they have to be deprecated for at least two or three releases so that people don't get broken code. |
@gaocegege @jlewi i think you need to update the ref in https://coveralls.io/github/tensorflow/k8s, i.e. change the repo name. |
SGTM, then it could be blocked until that time |
Tests should be fixed. |
I will fix it. |
/test all |
@gaocegege Is this PR still blocked? |
No, I will update it soon. |
Signed-off-by: Ce Gao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ce Gao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ce Gao <[email protected]>
Reviewed 14 of 18 files at r1, 5 of 5 files at r2. examples/tf_job_tensorboard_azure.yaml, line 1 at r2 (raw file):
We could probably just delete this file. I think the whole point of this file was to provide an example of TB on Azure. Now that we no longer support TB its not relevant. pkg/apis/tensorflow/v1alpha1/types.go, line 55 at r2 (raw file):
Can we delete this now? Do we use this image for anything now? Maybe add a TODO. Comments from Reviewable |
examples/tf_job_tensorboard_azure.yaml, line 1 at r2 (raw file): Previously, jlewi (Jeremy Lewi) wrote…
SGTM Comments from Reviewable |
pkg/apis/tensorflow/v1alpha1/types.go, line 55 at r2 (raw file): Previously, jlewi (Jeremy Lewi) wrote…
I think we could add a TODO and set the issue to be good first issue, and maybe we could attract more contributors. If no one is interested and I could fix it in another PR. WDYT I think we should add more contributor-friendly issues in the repo. Now we only have some regular contributors from several companies, it is not good, IMO Comments from Reviewable |
Signed-off-by: Ce Gao <[email protected]>
Reviewed 2 of 18 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r3. pkg/apis/tensorflow/v1alpha1/types.go, line 55 at r2 (raw file): Previously, gaocegege (Ce Gao) wrote…
A TODO seems good to me. I'm also fine with just filing an issue for this and not blocking this PR. Comments from Reviewable |
Reviewed 1 of 18 files at r1. Comments from Reviewable |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jlewi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1 similar comment
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jlewi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ref #347
Blocked until CI is running again.
PS: Dashboard code is not changed.
Signed-off-by: Ce Gao [email protected]
This change is