Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: add GenPodGroupName method to extract podGroupName in diffe… #1034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2019

Conversation

zlcnju
Copy link
Contributor

@zlcnju zlcnju commented Jun 25, 2019

…rent place


This change is Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from cheyang and jimexist June 25, 2019 09:18
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @zlcnju. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.744% when pulling cb95e16 on zlcnju:master into d746bde on kubeflow:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 25, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.744% when pulling 1787904 on zlcnju:master into d746bde on kubeflow:master.

@zlcnju
Copy link
Contributor Author

zlcnju commented Jun 26, 2019

/assign @johnugeorge

@johnugeorge
Copy link
Member

@zlcnju Why is this needed now?

@zlcnju
Copy link
Contributor Author

zlcnju commented Jun 27, 2019

@zlcnju Why is this needed now?

in kube-batch, the podgroup work when the annotation podgroupname is set。 So, the two places will be equal always. Now, they are equal by the principle both equals tfjob name. This is implicit, extracting one method will make it clear that how the annotation used in podgroup.

@johnugeorge
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

Copy link
Member

@gaocegege gaocegege left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold

We are releasing 0.6. Thus we will merge it after the release if the PR is ready.

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@gaocegege gaocegege left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold cancel
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gaocegege

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit eedd3bb into kubeflow:master Jul 16, 2019
ChenYi015 pushed a commit to ChenYi015/training-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants