-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix set startTime logic #1001
fix set startTime logic #1001
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
It is a historical problem. And I think we should follow k8s convention now.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gaocegege The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold WDYT @richardsliu |
/retest |
/test kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit |
2 similar comments
/test kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit |
/test kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit |
@richardsliu Could you have a look at this? |
I think it is caused by the CI infra, not your PR. We could retest to try |
Is k8s following the same convention? |
/retest |
@johnugeorge Yes, for k8s job controller, the startTime is set if startTime is nil no matter how many pods is running. |
/retest Yeah thus I think we need this PR. Thanks |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/hold cancel |
@wackxu Please rebase |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@gaocegege Sorry for the delay, rebased |
never mind Thanks for your contribution! |
/test kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit |
1 similar comment
/test kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit |
fix #1000
/assign @gaocegege @jlewi @richardsliu
This change is