-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(sdk): Relax the requirement that component inputs/outputs must appear on the command line. #6268
Merged
Merged
fix(sdk): Relax the requirement that component inputs/outputs must appear on the command line. #6268
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
832b3f6
Relax the requirement that component inputs/outputs must appear
neuromage bb38640
fix bugs, update goldens.
neuromage 901655d
Fix issue with inputs.
neuromage 49ae9e6
merge and update.
neuromage b87cbf5
Restore compiler yamls.
neuromage 2395feb
Disambiguate parameters and artifacts in component bridge.
neuromage 4055271
Restore goldens from HEAD.
neuromage 78cfac7
restore compiler_tests.py to HEAD.
neuromage 24e24e8
str-ify pipeline params.
neuromage 5190f68
cr comments.
neuromage File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like
_component_spec_inputs
is a list of inputs referencePipelineParam
, in another word, inputs with constant values would not appear in this list. It that right?If so, 1) maybe we can rename it to better reflect this fact. 2) I wonder if this
self._inputs += _pipeline_param.extract_pipelineparams_from_any
is still needed, because it looks to me you would have covered them when you construct_component_spec_inputs
down below?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Re: 1) I updated the names to be more specific and added a comment.
Re: 2), I can't remove that, as some params are specified on things like the container image. So this won't work I think. Also, the same code is used by things like ResourceOp, which does not have a component spec so it won't work there either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the explanation. That makes sense.
(This also reminds me the topic that component may have implicit inputs not captured in its inputs spec, and whether we should allow this to happen)