Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swap TF to Training operator #499

Merged

Conversation

andreyvelich
Copy link
Member

After this PR: kubeflow/training-operator#1348, we renamed tf-operator to training-operator.
We should make the appropriate changes.

/assign @kubeflow/wg-training-leads

/cc @james-jwu @Bobgy @zijianjoy

Copy link
Member

@terrytangyuan terrytangyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

/assign @james-jwu @zijianjoy

@james-jwu
Copy link
Contributor

james-jwu commented Oct 5, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@google-oss-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andreyvelich, james-jwu, Jeffwan, terrytangyuan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-robot google-oss-robot merged commit ad9fbef into kubeflow:master Oct 5, 2021
@andreyvelich andreyvelich deleted the swap-tf-to-training-operator branch October 5, 2021 20:10
judahrand pushed a commit to judahrand/internal-acls that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2021
* Swap TF to Training operator

* Fix group
zijianjoy pushed a commit to zijianjoy/internal-acls that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2022
* Swap TF to Training operator

* Fix group
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants