Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add support to combine service create --filename with other options #937
feat: Add support to combine service create --filename with other options #937
Changes from 4 commits
42c4076
ba133ed
2c7338d
857c046
1f8bf11
d76201c
3e0a752
062345d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why has this been removed ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's superseded by combination of
markFlagMakesRevision
andeditFlags.Apply
, per my suggestion/proposal from previous PR.https://github.com/knative/client/pull/937/files#diff-74b189b0b506d256ede4322475d950f5R285
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, and I think it makes sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could comment these lines and all tests are still passing. So this tells me no test for errors when
editFlags.Apply(...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But isn't
editFlags.Apply()
already covered ? Ideally, there is a dedicated unit test only for this method, and should not be tested indirectly within tests that test that intend to test other stuff.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I look at the overall test suite I see, that
editFlags.Apply()
is already tested to a high degree. Looking at that method though it looks like that it deserves some refactoring, it is far too large.