Closure_tree lets your ActiveRecord models act as nodes in a tree data structure
Common applications include modeling hierarchical data, like tags, threaded comments, page graphs in CMSes, and tracking user referrals.
Dramatically more performant than ancestry and acts_as_tree, and even more awesome than awesome_nested_set, closure_tree has some great features:
- Best-in-class select performance:
- Fetch your whole ancestor lineage in 1 SELECT.
- Grab all your descendants in 1 SELECT.
- Get all your siblings in 1 SELECT.
- Fetch all descendants as a nested hash in 1 SELECT.
- Find a node by ancestry path in 1 SELECT.
- Best-in-class mutation performance:
- 2 SQL INSERTs on node creation
- 3 SQL INSERT/UPDATEs on node reparenting
- Support for concurrency (using with_advisory_lock)
- Tested against ActiveRecord 4.2, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 and 6.0 with Ruby 2.5 and 2.6
- Support for reparenting children (and all their descendants)
- Support for single-table inheritance (STI) within the hierarchy
find_or_create_by_path
for building out heterogeneous hierarchies quickly and conveniently- Support for deterministic ordering
- Support for preordered traversal of descendants
- Support for rendering trees in DOT format, using Graphviz
- Excellent test coverage in a comprehensive variety of environments
See Bill Karwin's excellent Models for hierarchical data presentation for a description of different tree storage algorithms.
- Installation
- Warning
- Usage
- Accessing Data
- Polymorphic hierarchies with STI
- Deterministic ordering
- Concurrency
- FAQ
- Testing
- Change log
Note that closure_tree only supports ActiveRecord 4.2 and later, and has test coverage for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite.
-
Add
gem 'closure_tree'
to your Gemfile -
Run
bundle install
-
Add
has_closure_tree
(oracts_as_tree
, which is an alias of the same method) to your hierarchical model:class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base has_closure_tree end class AnotherTag < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_tree end
Make sure you check out the large number of options that
has_closure_tree
accepts.IMPORTANT: Make sure you add
has_closure_tree
afterattr_accessible
andself.table_name =
lines in your model.If you're already using other hierarchical gems, like
ancestry
oracts_as_tree
, please refer to the warning section! -
Add a migration to add a
parent_id
column to the hierarchical model. You may want to also add a column for deterministic ordering of children, but that's optional.class AddParentIdToTag < ActiveRecord::Migration def change add_column :tags, :parent_id, :integer end end
The column must be nullable. Root nodes have a
NULL
parent_id
. -
Run
rails g closure_tree:migration tag
(and replacetag
with your model name) to create the closure tree table for your model.By default the table name will be the model's table name, followed by "_hierarchies". Note that by calling
has_closure_tree
, a "virtual model" (in this case,TagHierarchy
) will be created dynamically. You don't need to create it. -
Run
rake db:migrate
-
If you're migrating from another system where your model already has a
parent_id
column, runTag.rebuild!
and yourtag_hierarchies
table will be truncated and rebuilt.If you're starting from scratch you don't need to call
rebuild!
.
NOTE: Run rails g closure_tree:config
to create an initializer with extra
configurations. (Optional)
As stated above, using multiple hierarchy gems (like ancestry
or nested set
) on the same model
will most likely result in pain, suffering, hair loss, tooth decay, heel-related ailments, and gingivitis.
Assume things will break.
Create a root node:
grandparent = Tag.create(name: 'Grandparent')
Child nodes are created by appending to the children collection:
parent = grandparent.children.create(name: 'Parent')
Or by appending to the children collection:
child2 = Tag.new(name: 'Second Child')
parent.children << child2
Or by calling the "add_child" method:
child3 = Tag.new(name: 'Third Child')
parent.add_child child3
Or by setting the parent on the child :
Tag.create(name: 'Fourth Child', parent: parent)
Then:
grandparent.self_and_descendants.collect(&:name)
=> ["Grandparent", "Parent", "First Child", "Second Child", "Third Child", "Fourth Child"]
child1.ancestry_path
=> ["Grandparent", "Parent", "First Child"]
You can find
as well as find_or_create
by "ancestry paths".
If you provide an array of strings to these methods, they reference the name
column in your
model, which can be overridden with the :name_column
option provided to has_closure_tree
.
child = Tag.find_or_create_by_path(%w[grandparent parent child])
As of v5.0.0, find_or_create_by_path
can also take an array of attribute hashes:
child = Tag.find_or_create_by_path([
{name: 'Grandparent', title: 'Sr.'},
{name: 'Parent', title: 'Mrs.'},
{name: 'Child', title: 'Jr.'}
])
If you're using STI, The attribute hashes can contain the sti_name
and things work as expected:
child = Label.find_or_create_by_path([
{type: 'DateLabel', name: '2014'},
{type: 'DateLabel', name: 'August'},
{type: 'DateLabel', name: '5'},
{type: 'EventLabel', name: 'Visit the Getty Center'}
])
Nodes can be moved around to other parents, and closure_tree moves the node's descendancy to the new parent for you:
d = Tag.find_or_create_by_path %w[a b c d]
h = Tag.find_or_create_by_path %w[e f g h]
e = h.root
d.add_child(e) # "d.children << e" would work too, of course
h.ancestry_path
=> ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h"]
When it is more convenient to simply change the parent_id
of a node directly (for example, when dealing with a form <select>
), closure_tree will handle the necessary changes automatically when the record is saved:
j = Tag.find 102
j.self_and_ancestor_ids
=> [102, 87, 77]
j.update parent_id: 96
j.self_and_ancestor_ids
=> [102, 96, 95, 78]
hash_tree
provides a method for rendering a subtree as an
ordered nested hash:
b = Tag.find_or_create_by_path %w(a b)
a = b.parent
b2 = Tag.find_or_create_by_path %w(a b2)
d1 = b.find_or_create_by_path %w(c1 d1)
c1 = d1.parent
d2 = b.find_or_create_by_path %w(c2 d2)
c2 = d2.parent
Tag.hash_tree
=> {a => {b => {c1 => {d1 => {}}, c2 => {d2 => {}}}, b2 => {}}}
Tag.hash_tree(:limit_depth => 2)
=> {a => {b => {}, b2 => {}}}
b.hash_tree
=> {b => {c1 => {d1 => {}}, c2 => {d2 => {}}}}
b.hash_tree(:limit_depth => 2)
=> {b => {c1 => {}, c2 => {}}}
If your tree is large (or might become so), use :limit_depth.
Without this option, hash_tree
will load the entire contents of that table into RAM. Your
server may not be happy trying to do this.
Since most of closure_tree's methods (e.g. children
) return regular ActiveRecord
scopes, you can use the includes
method for eager loading, e.g.
comment.children.includes(:author)
However, note that the above approach only eager loads the requested associations for the immediate children of comment
. If you want to walk through the entire tree, you may still end up making many queries and loading duplicate copies of objects.
In some cases, a viable alternative is the following:
comment.self_and_descendants.includes(:author)
This would load authors for comment
and all its descendants in a constant number of queries. However, the return value is an array of Comment
s, and the tree structure is thus lost, which makes it difficult to walk the tree using elegant recursive algorithms.
A third option is to use has_closure_tree_root
on the model that is composed by the closure_tree model (e.g. a Post
may be composed by a tree of Comment
s). So in post.rb
, you would do:
# app/models/post.rb
has_closure_tree_root :root_comment
This gives you a plain has_one
association (root_comment
) to the root Comment
(i.e. that with null parent_id
).
It also gives you a method called root_comment_including_tree
, which you can invoke as follows:
a_post.root_comment_including_tree(:author)
The result of this call will be the root Comment
with all descendants and associations loaded in a constant number of queries. Inverse associations are also setup on all nodes, so as you walk the tree, calling children
or parent
on any node will not trigger any further queries and no duplicate copies of objects are loaded into memory.
The class and foreign key of root_comment
are assumed to be Comment
and post_id
, respectively. These can be overridden in the usual way.
The same caveat stated above with hash_tree
also applies here: this method will load the entire tree into memory. If the tree is very large, this may be a bad idea, in which case using the eager loading methods above may be preferred.
to_dot_digraph
is suitable for passing into Graphviz.
For example, for the above tree, write out the DOT file with ruby:
File.open("example.dot", "w") { |f| f.write(Tag.root.to_dot_digraph) }
Then, in a shell, dot -Tpng example.dot > example.png
, which produces:
If you want to customize the label value, override the #to_digraph_label
instance method in your model.
Just for kicks, this is the test tree I used for proving that preordered tree traversal was correct:
When you include has_closure_tree
in your model, you can provide a hash to override the following defaults:
:parent_column_name
to override the column name of the parent foreign key in the model's table. This defaults to "parent_id".:hierarchy_class_name
to override the hierarchy class name. This defaults to the singular name of the model + "Hierarchy", likeTagHierarchy
.:hierarchy_table_name
to override the hierarchy table name. This defaults to the singular name of the model + "_hierarchies", liketag_hierarchies
.:dependent
determines what happens when a node is destroyed. Defaults tonullify
.:nullify
will simply set the parent column to null. Each child node will be considered a "root" node. This is the default.:delete_all
will delete all descendant nodes (which circumvents the destroy hooks):destroy
will destroy all descendant nodes (which runs the destroy hooks on each child node)nil
does nothing with descendant nodes
:name_column
used by #find_or_create_by_path
, #find_by_path
, andancestry_path
instance methods. This is primarily useful if the model only has one required field (like a "tag").:order
used to set up deterministic ordering:touch
delegates to thebelongs_to
annotation for the parent, sotouch
ing cascades to all children (the performance of this for deep trees isn't currently optimal).
Tag.root
returns an arbitrary root nodeTag.roots
returns all root nodesTag.leaves
returns all leaf nodesTag.hash_tree
returns an ordered, nested hash that can be depth-limited.Tag.find_by_path(path, attributes)
returns the node whose name path ispath
. See (#find_or_create_by_path).Tag.find_or_create_by_path(path, attributes)
returns the node whose name path ispath
, and will create the node if it doesn't exist already.See (#find_or_create_by_path).Tag.find_all_by_generation(generation_level)
returns the descendant nodes who aregeneration_level
away from a root.Tag.find_all_by_generation(0)
is equivalent toTag.roots
.Tag.with_ancestor(ancestors)
scopes to all descendants whose ancestor is in the given list.Tag.lowest_common_ancestor(descendants)
finds the lowest common ancestor of the descendants.
tag.root
returns the root for this nodetag.root?
returns true if this is a root nodetag.root_of?(node)
returns true if current node is root of another onetag.child?
returns true if this is a child node. It has a parent.tag.leaf?
returns true if this is a leaf node. It has no children.tag.leaves
is scoped to all leaf nodes in self_and_descendants.tag.depth
returns the depth, or "generation", for this node in the tree. A root node will have a value of 0.tag.parent
returns the node's immediate parent. Root nodes will return nil.tag.parent_of?(node)
returns true if current node is parent of another onetag.children
is ahas_many
of immediate children (just those nodes whose parent is the current node).tag.child_ids
is an array of the IDs of the children.tag.child_of?(node)
returns true if current node is child of another onetag.ancestors
is a ordered scope of [ parent, grandparent, great grandparent, … ]. Note that the size of this array will always equaltag.depth
.tag.ancestor_ids
is an array of the IDs of the ancestors.tag.ancestor_of?(node)
returns true if current node is ancestor of another onetag.self_and_ancestors
returns a scope containing self, parent, grandparent, great grandparent, etc.tag.self_and_ancestors_ids
returns IDs containing self, parent, grandparent, great grandparent, etc.tag.siblings
returns a scope containing all nodes with the same parent astag
, excluding self.tag.sibling_ids
returns an array of the IDs of the siblings.tag.self_and_siblings
returns a scope containing all nodes with the same parent astag
, including self.tag.descendants
returns a scope of all children, childrens' children, etc., excluding self ordered by depth.tag.descendant_ids
returns an array of the IDs of the descendants.tag.descendant_of?(node)
returns true if current node is descendant of another onetag.self_and_descendants
returns a scope of self, all children, childrens' children, etc., ordered by depth.tag.self_and_descendant_ids
returns IDs of self, all children, childrens' children, etc., ordered by depth.tag.family_of?
returns true if current node and another one have a same root.tag.hash_tree
returns an ordered, nested hash that can be depth-limited.tag.find_by_path(path)
returns the node whose name path fromtag
ispath
. See (#find_or_create_by_path).tag.find_or_create_by_path(path)
returns the node whose name path fromtag
ispath
, and will create the node if it doesn't exist already.See (#find_or_create_by_path).tag.find_all_by_generation(generation_level)
returns the descendant nodes who aregeneration_level
away fromtag
.tag.find_all_by_generation(0).to_a
==[tag]
tag.find_all_by_generation(1)
==tag.children
tag.find_all_by_generation(2)
will return the tag's grandchildren, and so on.
tag.destroy
will destroy a node and do something to its children, which is determined by the:dependent
option passed tohas_closure_tree
.
Polymorphic models using single table inheritance (STI) are supported:
- Create a db migration that adds a String
type
column to your model - Subclass the model class. You only need to add
has_closure_tree
to your base class:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
has_closure_tree
end
class WhenTag < Tag ; end
class WhereTag < Tag ; end
class WhatTag < Tag ; end
Note that if you call rebuild!
on any of the subclasses, the complete Tag hierarchy will be emptied, thus taking the hiearchies of all other subclasses with it (issue #275). However, only the hierarchies for the class rebuild!
was called on will be rebuilt, leaving the other subclasses without hierarchy entries.
You can work around that by overloading the rebuild!
class method in all your STI subclasses and call the super classes rebuild!
method:
class WhatTag < Tag
def self.rebuild!
Tag.rebuild!
end
end
This way, the complete hierarchy including all subclasses will be rebuilt.
By default, children will be ordered by your database engine, which may not be what you want.
If you want to order children alphabetically, and your model has a name
column, you'd do this:
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
has_closure_tree order: 'name'
end
If you want a specific order, add a new integer column to your model in a migration:
t.integer :sort_order
and in your model:
class OrderedTag < ActiveRecord::Base
has_closure_tree order: 'sort_order', numeric_order: true
end
When you enable order
, you'll also have the following new methods injected into your model:
tag.siblings_before
is a scope containing all nodes with the same parent astag
, whose sort order column is less thanself
. These will be ordered properly, so thelast
element in scope will be the sibling immediately beforeself
tag.siblings_after
is a scope containing all nodes with the same parent astag
, whose sort order column is more thanself
. These will be ordered properly, so thefirst
element in scope will be the sibling immediately "after"self
If your order
column is an integer attribute, you'll also have these:
-
The class method
#roots_and_descendants_preordered
, which returns all nodes in your tree, pre-ordered. -
node1.self_and_descendants_preordered
which will return descendants, pre-ordered. -
node1.append_child(node2)
(which is an alias toadd_child
), which will- set
node2
's parent tonode1
- set
node2
's sort order to place node2 last in thechildren
array
- set
-
node1.prepend_child(node2)
which will- set
node2
's parent tonode1
- set
node2
's sort order to place node2 first in thechildren
array Note that all ofnode1
's children's sort_orders will be incremented
- set
-
node1.prepend_sibling(node2)
which will- set
node2
to the same parent asnode1
, - set
node2
's order column to 1 less thannode1
's value, and - increment the order_column of all children of node1's parents whose order_column is > node2's new value by 1.
- set
-
node1.append_sibling(node2)
which will- set
node2
to the same parent asnode1
, - set
node2
's order column to 1 more thannode1
's value, and - increment the order_column of all children of node1's parents whose order_column is > node2's new value by 1.
- set
root = OrderedTag.create(name: 'root')
a = root.append_child(Label.new(name: 'a'))
b = OrderedTag.create(name: 'b')
c = OrderedTag.create(name: 'c')
# We have to call 'root.reload.children' because root won't be in sync with the database otherwise:
a.append_sibling(b)
root.reload.children.pluck(:name)
=> ["a", "b"]
a.prepend_sibling(b)
root.reload.children.pluck(:name)
=> ["b", "a"]
a.append_sibling(c)
root.reload.children.pluck(:name)
=> ["b", "a", "c"]
b.append_sibling(c)
root.reload.children.pluck(:name)
=> ["b", "c", "a"]
With numeric ordering, root nodes are, by default, assigned order values globally across the whole database table. So for instance if you have 5 nodes with no parent, they will be ordered 0 through 4 by default. If your model represents many separate trees and you have a lot of records, this can cause performance problems, and doesn't really make much sense.
You can disable this default behavior by passing dont_order_roots: true
as an option to your delcaration:
has_closure_tree order: 'sort_order', numeric_order: true, dont_order_roots: true
In this case, calling prepend_sibling
and append_sibling
on a root node or calling
roots_and_descendants_preordered
on the model will raise a RootOrderingDisabledError
.
The dont_order_roots
option will be ignored unless numeric_order
is set to true.
Several methods, especially #rebuild
and #find_or_create_by_path
, cannot run concurrently correctly.
#find_or_create_by_path
, for example, may create duplicate nodes.
Database row-level locks work correctly with PostgreSQL, but MySQL's row-level locking is broken, and erroneously reports deadlocks where there are none. To work around this, and have a consistent implementation for both MySQL and PostgreSQL, with_advisory_lock is used automatically to ensure correctness.
If you are already managing concurrency elsewhere in your application, and want to disable the use
of with_advisory_lock, pass with_advisory_lock: false
in the options hash:
class Tag
has_closure_tree with_advisory_lock: false
end
Note that you will eventually have data corruption if you disable advisory locks, write to your database with multiple threads, and don't provide an alternative mutex.
You can customize error messages using I18n:
en-US:
closure_tree:
loop_error: Your descendant cannot be your parent!
Yup! Ilya Bodrov wrote Nested Comments with Rails.
No. Please see issue 86 for details.
No. update_attribute
skips the validation hook that is required for maintaining the
hierarchy table.
No. Please see issue 197 for details.
No. This gem's API is based on the assumption that each node has either 0 or 1 parent.
The underlying closure tree structure will support multiple parents, but there would be many breaking-API changes to support it. I'm open to suggestions and pull requests.
Test fixtures aren't going to be running your after_save
hooks after inserting all your
fixture data, so you need to call .rebuild!
before your test runs. There's an example in
the spec tag_spec.rb
:
describe "Tag with fixtures" do
fixtures :tags
before :each do
Tag.rebuild! # <- required if you use fixtures
end
However, if you're just starting with Rails, may I humbly suggest you adopt a factory library, rather than using fixtures? Lots of people have written about this already.
This is expected if you aren't using MySQL or Postgresql for your tests.
SQLite doesn't have advisory locks, so we resort to file locking, which will only work
if the FLOCK_DIR
is set consistently for all ruby processes.
In your spec_helper.rb
or minitest_helper.rb
, add a before
and after
block:
before do
ENV['FLOCK_DIR'] = Dir.mktmpdir
end
after do
FileUtils.remove_entry_secure ENV['FLOCK_DIR']
end
When building from source, the mysql2
, pg
, and sqlite
gems need their native client libraries
installed on your system. Note that this error isn't specific to ClosureTree.
On Ubuntu/Debian systems, run:
sudo apt-get install libpq-dev libsqlite3-dev libmysqlclient-dev
bundle install
A bug was introduced in MySQL's query optimizer. See the workaround here.
Upgrade to MySQL 5.7.12 or later if you see this issue:
Mysql2::Error: You can't specify target table '*_hierarchies' for update in FROM clause
Closure tree comes with some RSpec2/3 matchers which you may use for your tests:
require 'spec_helper'
require 'closure_tree/test/matcher'
describe Category do
# Should syntax
it { should be_a_closure_tree }
# Expect syntax
it { is_expected.to be_a_closure_tree }
end
describe Label do
# Should syntax
it { should be_a_closure_tree.ordered }
# Expect syntax
it { is_expected.to be_a_closure_tree.ordered }
end
describe TodoList::Item do
# Should syntax
it { should be_a_closure_tree.ordered(:priority_order) }
# Expect syntax
it { is_expected.to be_a_closure_tree.ordered(:priority_order) }
end
Closure tree is tested under every valid combination of
- Ruby 2.5, 2.6
- ActiveRecord 4.2, 5.x and 6.0
- PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. Concurrency tests are only run with MySQL and PostgreSQL.
Assuming you're using rbenv, you can use tests.sh
to
run the test matrix locally.
See the change log.
- The 45+ engineers around the world that have contributed their time and code to this gem (see the changelog!)
- https://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set
- https://github.com/patshaughnessy/class_factory
- JetBrains, which provides an open-source license to RubyMine for the development of this project.