Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

types: allow void for generic type #227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

peterphanouvong
Copy link
Collaborator

Explain your changes

  • allow KindeUser type to be used without a specified generic
    Suppose there is a related issue with enough detail for a reviewer to understand your changes fully. In that case, you can omit an explanation and instead include either “Fixes #XX” or “Updates #XX” where “XX” is the issue number.

Checklist

🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the KindeUser interface in the types.d.ts file. The generic type parameter has been modified from <T> to <T = void>, which allows the type parameter to default to void if no argument is specified. This adjustment simplifies the interface's usage without altering any underlying logic, error handling, or control flow.

Changes

File Change Summary
types.d.ts Updated KindeUser interface from <T> to <T = void> for optional type parameter.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant KindeUser

    User->>KindeUser: Create instance with no type argument
    KindeUser->>KindeUser: Default type set to void
    User->>KindeUser: Create instance with specific type argument
    KindeUser->>KindeUser: Type set to specified argument
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
types.d.ts (1)

160-162: LGTM! The change improves developer experience.

The modification to make the generic type parameter optional with void as default is a good improvement. It simplifies usage when custom properties aren't needed while maintaining backward compatibility and type safety.

Consider adding a JSDoc comment to document the generic type parameter usage:

+/**
+ * Represents a Kinde user with optional custom properties.
+ * @template T - Type of custom user properties. Defaults to void when no custom properties are needed.
+ */
export interface KindeUser<T = void> extends KindeUserBase {
  properties?: KindeUserProperties<T>;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbdfe85 and b1edfaa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • types.d.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
types.d.ts (1)

160-162: Verify usage patterns in the codebase.

Let's ensure this change doesn't introduce any unexpected issues with existing usage patterns.

✅ Verification successful

Change is safe but requires documentation update

The verification shows this change is backwards compatible since:

  • The default type parameter T = void maintains existing behavior
  • All current usages already specify explicit type parameters:
    • Record<string, string> in type definitions
    • Record<string, any> and generic T in session handling
    • CustomPropertyType in user object generation

However, the change from Record<string, any> to void default should be documented.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check current usage patterns of KindeUser to ensure compatibility

# Test 1: Find direct usage of KindeUser type
echo "=== Direct KindeUser usage ==="
rg "KindeUser" --type ts

# Test 2: Look for potential type parameter specifications
echo -e "\n=== KindeUser type parameter usage ==="
rg "KindeUser<" --type ts

Length of output: 1483

@DanielRivers DanielRivers merged commit 22cea11 into main Oct 28, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants