test: added podtato-head integration test scenario

[bacherfl]

Closes #321
Signed-off-by: Florian Bacher [email protected]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #486 (66a462b) into main (ba6eadd) will decrease coverage by 10.90%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #486       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   59.68%   48.78%   -10.91%     
===========================================
  Files          28       55       +27     
  Lines        2101     5143     +3042     
===========================================
+ Hits         1254     2509     +1255     
- Misses        743     2527     +1784     
- Partials      104      107        +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...or/controllers/keptnworkloadinstance/controller.go	77.31% <0.00%> (-1.55%)	⬇️
operator/controllers/common/evaluationhandler.go	78.07% <0.00%> (-0.57%)	⬇️
operator/api/v1alpha2/keptntaskdefinition_types.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
operator/api/v1alpha2/keptntask_types.go	97.14% <0.00%> (ø)
operator/api/v1alpha2/keptnapp_types.go	91.66% <0.00%> (ø)
operator/api/v1alpha1/keptnapp_conversion.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ator/api/v1alpha2/keptnevaluationprovider_types.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...erator/api/v1alpha2/keptnworkloadinstance_types.go	90.76% <0.00%> (ø)
operator/api/v1alpha2/keptnapp_webhook.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
operator/api/v1alpha2/common/phases.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 19 more

Flag	Coverage Δ
component-tests	50.88% <ø> (-0.20%)	⬇️
keptn-lifecycle-operator	47.27% <ø> (-9.38%)	⬇️
scheduler	4.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[thschue]

It would make sense to add at least one test where we won't have a positive outcome. For instance, we could test for an application where at least one workload is missing, and the application should not come up or fail.

[bacherfl]

It would make sense to add at least one test where we won't have a positive outcome. For instance, we could test for an application where at least one workload is missing, and the application should not come up or fail.

agree, will add another test case to this PR

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[odubajDT]

lgtm! can we please create a ticket for the failed evaluation and test, that the remaining phases get cancelled ?

[bacherfl]

lgtm! can we please create a ticket for the failed evaluation and test, that the remaining phases get cancelled ?

sure, here is the new issue: #512