Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove explicit architecture in go build #224

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2021

Conversation

backjo
Copy link
Collaborator

@backjo backjo commented Jan 23, 2021

The explicit GOARCH variable in the Dockerfile causes ARM images to contain an AMD64 executable. This variable is unnecessary, since go will inspect the system to figure out what architecture it is running in.

Signed-off-by: Jonah Back [email protected]

@backjo backjo requested review from a team as code owners January 23, 2021 00:37
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #224 (fd09e9c) into master (2b0cd04) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #224   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.16%   88.16%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        2188     2188           
=======================================
  Hits         1929     1929           
  Misses        159      159           
  Partials      100      100           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2b0cd04...fd09e9c. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@eytan-avisror eytan-avisror left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@eytan-avisror eytan-avisror merged commit 07513e6 into keikoproj:master Jan 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants