Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 14, 2022. It is now read-only.

Update django-storages to 1.6.5 #156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2017

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pyup-bot pyup-bot commented Aug 1, 2017

There's a new version of django-storages available.
You are currently using 1.6.4. I have updated it to 1.6.5

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Repo

Changelog

1.6.5


  • Fix Django 1.11 regression with gzipped content being saved twice
    resulting in empty files (367, 371, 373_)
  • Fix the mtime when gzipping content on S3Boto3Storage (374_)

.. _367: jschneier/django-storages#367
.. _371: jschneier/django-storages#371
.. _373: jschneier/django-storages#373
.. _374: jschneier/django-storages#374

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #156 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #156   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.99%   68.99%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        1319     1319           
  Branches      107      107           
=======================================
  Hits          910      910           
  Misses        407      407           
  Partials        2        2

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e754dad...9c0f1e4. Read the comment docs.

@kavdev kavdev merged commit d10d4c5 into master Aug 1, 2017
@kavdev kavdev deleted the pyup-update-django-storages-1.6.4-to-1.6.5 branch August 1, 2017 17:36
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants