Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix karmadactl addon failed to install karmada-scheduler-estimator due to unknown flag #5523

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

chaosi-zju
Copy link
Member

@chaosi-zju chaosi-zju commented Sep 11, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

fix launch arguments when install estimator by karmadactl which caused its installation failure

$ kubectl get pods -o wide -n karmada-system
...
karmada-system       karmada-scheduler-estimator-member4-774fd8d76c-skjj9            0/1     Error     1 (9s ago)   10s   10.91.0.17   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
...

$ kubectl logs -f  karmada-scheduler-estimator-member4-774fd8d76c-skjj9 -n karmada-system                                                    
Usage:
  karmada-scheduler-estimator [flags]
...
Error: unknown flag: --client-cert-auth

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

`karmadactl`: Fixed the issue that karmadactl addon failed to install karmada-scheduler-estimator due to unknown flag.

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Sep 11, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 11, 2024
@chaosi-zju
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @zhzhuang-zju

@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 32.44%. Comparing base (4ac95b9) to head (e7db9d7).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/scheduler-estimator/app/options/options.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5523      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.45%   32.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         643      643              
  Lines       44497    44497              
==========================================
- Hits        14440    14438       -2     
- Misses      28962    28963       +1     
- Partials     1095     1096       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 32.44% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chaosi-zju
Copy link
Member Author

test report:

$ kubectl get pods -o wide -n karmada-system                         
NAME                                                   READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE     IP            NODE                                    NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
etcd-0                                                 1/1     Running   0          10m     10.187.0.5    karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-aggregated-apiserver-7db6f685c6-kwr4z          1/1     Running   0          10m     10.187.0.7    karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-apiserver-799cfbb68f-df99k                     1/1     Running   0          10m     10.187.0.6    karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-controller-manager-ffc79cbf5-829dn             1/1     Running   0          8m48s   10.187.0.10   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-descheduler-744f98cb8f-9jz8c                   1/1     Running   0          5m8s    10.187.0.13   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-metrics-adapter-59cdb58586-w87xj               1/1     Running   0          4m20s   10.187.0.14   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-scheduler-dbb6847f7-b64qv                      1/1     Running   0          9m17s   10.187.0.9    karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-scheduler-estimator-member4-5896d89644-gprzw   1/1     Running   0          3m5s    10.187.0.15   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-search-6c4f64c474-kf4c7                        1/1     Running   0          6m7s    10.187.0.12   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
karmada-webhook-666d8d6754-qx2fx                       1/1     Running   0          8m11s   10.187.0.11   karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>
kube-controller-manager-787569d669-fmhnv               1/1     Running   0          9m19s   10.187.0.8    karmada-karmadactl-host-control-plane   <none>           <none>

Copy link
Member

@RainbowMango RainbowMango left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/retitle Fix karmadactl addon failed to install karmada-scheduler-estimator due to unknown flag

@karmada-bot karmada-bot changed the title fix launch arguments when install estimator by karmadactl which caused its installation failure Fix karmadactl addon failed to install karmada-scheduler-estimator due to unknown flag Sep 11, 2024
@RainbowMango
Copy link
Member

This issue was introduced by #5040 ? mistakenly introduced not exist flag?

@chaosi-zju
Copy link
Member Author

This issue was introduced by #5040 ? mistakenly introduced not exist flag?

Looks like it is

The --client-cert-auth=true seems to be the argument of etcd-server, estimator was not used.

@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

@chaosi-zju Thank you for correcting my previous mistake.

This issue was introduced by #5040 ? mistakenly introduced not exist flag?

Yes, it seems that not all relevant parts were updated after the plan change. I will check to see if there are any remaining areas where this flag needs to be removed.

@zhzhuang-zju
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
please cherry pick to release-1.11, thanks

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@RainbowMango RainbowMango left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RainbowMango

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 12, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot merged commit 76d265f into karmada-io:master Sep 12, 2024
12 checks passed
karmada-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
…23-upstream-release-1.11

Automated cherry pick of #5523: Fix `karmadactl addon` failed to install karmada-scheduler-estimator due to unknown flag
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants