-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 913
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
charts/karmada: ignore the static-resource Pod in the post-install check #5369
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5369 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 29.41% 29.40% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 632 632
Lines 43835 43835
==========================================
- Hits 12892 12889 -3
- Misses 30003 30004 +1
- Partials 940 942 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/assign @chaosi-zju |
Hi, this problem realted to issue #5233 if you continue to try helm installation, you may also encounter this problem. I have a batter resolution in PR #5305, but lack of people who good at helm reviews. I think you are very proficient in helm. Can you help me review it? when that pr merged, this problem will gone. |
I didn't see how this relates to #5233, even if we merge #5305, the
I can help review #5305, but I'm new to the Karmada chart, I don't know the big picture about it, so I can barely give some review comments. |
yes
no, after my #5305, it will no longer check
the relation is, you can see that wait condition in unreasonable wait condition caused #5233 and yours failure, so we hope to completely rectify these wait conditions, eventually we want to change it to #5305 Of cource, if your issue is more urgent, we can also merge yours in first and then I'll think about moving forward #5305.
actually, I mainly want to ask for your opinion on the issue of sequentially installing deployments. I wonder if you know some best practices. |
We may not on the same page. The My issue is that if the
Hardly at all, Helm's ability to handle dependency installation is very weak. |
Oh, sorry ! My fault, this pr has been around for nearly 10 days, and my memory is a little confused (((;꒪ꈊ꒪;))) I originally intended to remove this waiting check in post-install Job directly (let job auto cleanup after finished), and then for some reason did not do so, I mistakenly thought I did. So, your this PR is not conflict with that PR, I will continue to review it~ |
Signed-off-by: Xinzhao Xu <[email protected]>
/retest |
/lgtm |
/assign @RainbowMango |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
Thanks.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: RainbowMango The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
I encountered the following situation: the
static-resource
Job failed during execution, so it retried once. The retry was successful, and although the Job eventually completed successfully, the initial failure resulted in a failed Pod. Because of this failed Pod, the post-install check script kept running, even though all Karmada components were already running. This patch makes the post-install script ignore Pods related tostatic-resource
.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: