karmada-operator: fixed operator manifests format

[calvin0327]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Found a tab character that violates indentation.

fixed operator manifests format.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

The origin pr: #4198

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

`karmada-operator`: Fixed an issue that components can not be deployed due to invalid manifests.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5b8a7f7) 52.00% compared to head (8ae84c7) 52.00%.
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4318   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.00%   52.00%           
=======================================
  Files         242      242           
  Lines       23993    23984    -9     
=======================================
- Hits        12478    12474    -4     
+ Misses      10834    10830    -4     
+ Partials      681      680    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	52.00% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[RainbowMango]

Please check if this issue exists in karmadactl init and chart.

/lgtm
/approve

This reminds me we need to setup the CI for operator...

[karmada-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RainbowMango

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• operator/OWNERS [RainbowMango]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[calvin0327]

Please check if this issue exists in karmadactl init and chart.

/lgtm /approve

This reminds me we need to setup the CI for operator...

Yes, I have checked and only operator has this problem.