Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No remote with conf PR #220

Open
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

SirOibaf
Copy link
Contributor

@SirOibaf SirOibaf commented Nov 4, 2022

No description provided.

@SirOibaf SirOibaf changed the title No remove with conf PR No remote with conf PR Nov 4, 2022
SirOibaf and others added 12 commits November 24, 2022 15:24
…ency issues (#4)

[CLOUD-543] Print Karamel version in logs

[CLOUD-543] Leave old method untouched for easy reference in the future

[CLOUD-543] Lock also another region which may reconnect the client (#5)

[CLOUD-570] Serialize execution of some recipes on multiple machines (karamelchef#7)

[CLOUD-570] Make recipes parallelism configurable

[CLOUD-570] Ignore recipe parallelism if less than or equal to zero

[CLOUD-570] Fix deadlock by moving the lock after queuing, right before execution

[CLOUD-570] Log information of lock claims

[CLOUD-570] Documentation

[CLOUD-556] Wait for a while before exit so that web UI can catch up (karamelchef#8)

increase heap size to 6gb (karamelchef#9)

[CLOUD-580] Make working directory configurable by environment variable (karamelchef#6)

[CLOUD-580] Update documentation

[no_remote_conf_sync] Fix
…ed do not proceed to the next node in the pipelie but wait until the recipe has run successfully (karamelchef#10)

* [HWORKS-680] Blocked status

[HWORKS-680] In case of parallelism constraints, if a recipe has failed do not proceed to the next node in the pipelie but wait until the recipe has run successfully

* [HWORKS-680] Remove type cast
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants