E2e bump timeouts #128
Merged
E2e bump timeouts #128
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sometimes 2 seconds can be not enough on CI to reconcile the attachments for a pod; also, this timeout is also used for a `Consistently` clause, where 2 seconds is also too little. Thus, let's give it some more time. Signed-off-by: Miguel Duarte Barroso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Duarte Barroso <[email protected]>
|
/lgtm |
qinqon
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Sometimes 2 seconds can be not enough on CI to reconcile the attachments
for a pod when a pod does not feature the interface names; also, this timeout
is also used for a
Consistentlyclause, where 2 seconds is also too little.Thus, let's give it some more time.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #124
Special notes for your reviewer (optional):