-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Increase coverage #334
Increase coverage #334
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 65.11% // Head: 80.45% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #334 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 65.11% 80.45% +15.34%
===========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 1740 1699 -41
Branches 331 324 -7
===========================================
+ Hits 1133 1367 +234
+ Misses 522 229 -293
- Partials 85 103 +18
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
well done, old chum! I applaud the goal, and do wonder if we can get some more on-going bang for the coverage buck with e.g. schemathesis... nothing wrong with cranking up the specificity of the API description as well. These might want to be gated behind a flag, as they can be... long. Especially once you use them for a while. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @blink1073
Goal is to hit 80%