Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ES6 and prerequisite to shortcut editor #1351

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2016
Merged

ES6 and prerequisite to shortcut editor #1351

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2016

Conversation

Carreau
Copy link
Member

@Carreau Carreau commented Apr 14, 2016

For whatever reason casper seem to be unhappy when I actually introduce es6 things in modules,
so this is a subset of #1347 where tests are (or at least should be) passing on travis.

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@

define([
'base/js/utils',
'base/js/keyboard',
'base/js/keyboard'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stripping trailing commas makes me a little sad. Just curious: what brought this on?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, tried enabling eslint and my editor complains. I can deactivate and revert that.

@Carreau
Copy link
Member Author

Carreau commented Apr 15, 2016

Fixed.

@minrk minrk added this to the 5.0 milestone Apr 18, 2016
@minrk minrk changed the title Es6 and prerequisite to shortcut editor. ES6 and prerequisite to shortcut editor Apr 18, 2016
@minrk minrk merged commit f75e591 into jupyter:master Apr 18, 2016
@Carreau
Copy link
Member Author

Carreau commented Apr 18, 2016

Yeah ! Thanks !

@Carreau Carreau deleted the es6 branch April 18, 2016 10:50
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 14, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants