-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[JUJU-796] Add relate method and deprecate add-relation #660
Conversation
acbbfc7
to
09a5e58
Compare
I label this as "do-not-merge" until a we have a consistent message in the juju CLI. |
09a5e58
to
3caaf1b
Compare
!!build!! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than my comments about the duplication in tests, this lgtm, the CI failures seem to be intermittent glitches, I think we're good there too 👍
3caaf1b
to
7d89a38
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This lgtm. The CI fails are unrelated to this PR, so you're clear for landing.
This is to follow the pattern we are following going ahead with Juju. change the name of add-relation to relate, but keep add-relation, which calls relate for backwards compatibility This method is then to be removed at the next major version bump See this PR for more details juju/juju#13907
7d89a38
to
d810ec6
Compare
I just ran the CI manually for this one and all the tests pass, this is clear for landing 👍 |
Description
This is to follow the pattern we are following going ahead with Juju.
change the name of add-relation to relate, but keep add-relation, which
calls relate for backwards compatibility
This method should then be removed at the next major version bump
See this PR for more details
juju/juju#13907
QA Steps